Who am I?
I make it my goal to look not only to my own interests, but also to the interests of others. Browse my portoflio and discover the creative side of my being. Enough said for now, start scrolling.
Roaming Outside the Box
I'm never satisfied with the current trends and fads flying around the web. Creativity, I believe will never progress unless we climb outside the confining box of simplemindedness.

Grab a Quick Copy of my vCard




Weddings – $4,500
  • 10 hour coverage
  • 1-3 photographers
  • Online proofing
  • DVD w/800+ digital hi-res negatives
  • 10×10 leather album w/65+ prints
Portraits – $500
  • 1 hour coverage
  • Image retouching/editing
  • Online proofing
  • DVD w/200+ digital hi-res negatives
  • Online slideshow to share with others


The “Nutrient” Issue

In Wichita, Kansas, the debate over water fluoridation continues. Fluoride Free Kansas, an opposition group, has made a variety of claims that are not backed by the scientific evidence. Consider this example. In a newspaper ad, the group declares: “Contrary to claims by fluoridation opponents, fluoride is not a nutrient …” This claim is false. Consider the following evidence:

1 micro motor. The Institute of Medicine’s Food and Nutrition Board issued a 1997 report that included fluoride and provided a recommended daily intake for fluoride. As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explains, “These guidelines describe the dietary reference intakes for specific nutrients known to be beneficial to health including fluoride.”

2. Through the years, a number of highly respected health officials have identified fluoride as a nutrient. In the Surgeon General’s Report on Nutrition and Health (1988, pp. 368-369), former U mobile dental unit.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop wrote, “Although fluoride is present in foods, the most efficient source of this nutrient for the general public is community drinking water … to which fluoride is added to reach the optimal level.”

3. The National Institutes of Health classifies fluoride among the “minerals and essential trace elements.”

4. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Nutrient Data Laboratory includes fluoride in its database of nutrients.

So which organization should Wichita residents trust? An anti-fluoride group whose leaders have no known credentials in science and nutrition? Or the Institute of Medicine, the National Institutes of Health, a former Surgeon General, and the federal Nutrient Data Laboratory?

State Dental Budget Cuts Leave Low-Income Residents With Little To No Coverage

Dental coverage for Medicaid recipients is the first to go when budget cuts take place. Medicaid is required to retain dental coverage for children, however, coverage is “optional” for adults. One out of the five states has cut their dental care coverage by about 92%. Vincent Morales (Seattle Resident) states that his “rent is very high” and because of “budget cuts” his “oral needs are pushed aside”.

In addition, select states are only covering “emergency procedures” for adults. According to Shelly Gehshan from the Pew Children’s Dental Campaign, if parents don’t have access to dental care, they sometimes don’t ensure their kids go to the dentist regularly. portable dental unit

Misrepresenting the National Research Council Report

The former CEO of the Oregon chapter of the American Cancer Society has written this column opposing efforts to fluoridate drinking water in Portland. In his column, Rick North identified three “main sources” that led him to change his mind about fluoridation dental equipment. North claimed that these sources provide “an enormous amount of evidence that water fluoridation” can threaten human health.

So what are his three sources? Two of them are books written by leading anti-fluoride activists. These books float the theory that dentists, industry and government conspired in some way or another to promote fluoride implant machine.

The only reputable, independent source among the three that North cited was a National Research Council (NRC) report issued in 2006. Did this NRC report provide “an enormous amount of evidence” that the water fluoridated by public water systems can be harmful? No, it did not. In fact, North ignored or overlooked a very critical point. Read the NRC’s own summary of its 2006 report. In this summary, the NRC committee writes that

“… the committee’s conclusions regarding the potential for adverse effects from fluoride at 2 to 4 mg/L in drinking water do not apply at the lower water fluoride levels commonly experienced by most U.S. citizens.”

The NRC report focused on water in areas of the U.S. in which the natural fluoride levels were significantly higher than the level used to fluoridate community water systems. North’s statement is an example of how fluoridation opponents misrepresent scientific research.

The Spin Behind the IQ Fluoride Argument

As you know, opponents of water fluoridation circulated an article this summer from a reputable journal reviewing a number of fluoride-IQ studies that were done in China, Iran, and Mongolia. Their message was a simple one: fluoride causes lower IQs in kids. Opponents ignored the fact that the co-authors of this article raised several concerns about the quality of these studies.

Now, here’s another reason why this argument lacks credibility dental file. Between the 1940s and the 1990s, the average IQ scores of Americans improved 15 points. This gain (approximately 3 IQ points per decade) came during the same period when fluoridation steadily expanded to serve millions and millions of additional Americans.

Has Much Changed in 57 Years

Sure, a whole lot has changed since 1956. Today, we have cable TV and the internet. We also have Blue Ray discs, DVD technology and iPods. And we’ve lived through several economic recessions.

On the other hand, if you consider the rhetoric that is circulated by opponents of water fluoridation, it might seem as though we’ve been transported back in time. The May 19, 1956 issue of The Saturday Evening Post — one of the best-read magazines of that era — contained an article entitled “The Fight Over Fluoridation tooth scaler australia.” Here are some of the observations made in the article:

The opponents of water fluoridation have counterattacked on a nationwide front. The opposition cross-sections like poor bacon: The streaks of logic, responsibility and good will are almost lost among layers of irresponsible hollering. … [then there] are the chronic hatemongers, who package anti-fluoridation in with their other scurrilous campaigns.

We saw an example of this “package” approach last year when the leader of the Fluoride Action Network announced that he had formed an alliance with a group that criticizes childhood vaccines.

The Post article also shared this interesting tidbit:

A technique for deflating crank reactions (to fluoridation) has appeared in such forehanded towns as Charlotte, North Carolina, Martinsburg, West Virginia, and Newburgh (NY). City Hall announces that fluoridation will begin on a certain day . . dental air compressor. and lets the complaints roll in. “This water is ruining photographic negatives.” … “It killed my goldfish.” … “It brought grandma’s asthma back.” … The newspapers print much of this. Then City Hall announces that, regrettable as these things are, fluoride can’t be the cause — the actual start of fluoridation has been postponed for technical reasons to the first of next month.

In other words, whipping up unfounded fear can lead a lot of well-meaning people to draw the wrong conclusions. Ultrasonic Scaler

A Common-Sense Column

An editor of The News-Tribune in Tacoma, Washington, has written an excellent column about the savings that result when communities fluoridate their drinking water to the optimal level scian nebulizer. Patrick O’Callahan writes:

I was in my middle twenties before I knew what a cavity was. My friends had them; I almost felt left out. I happened to have spent my early years in Madison, Wis., one of the first cities to have its water supply fluoridated.

Our editorial today argues for restoring Medicaid dental coverage for poor adults. … Total Medicaid dental in Washington could come in at something north of $90 million per biennium.

That cost might be pared in the future if all of Washington’s cities adopted fluoridation, which the U.S. Centers for Disease Controls and Prevention has called “one of the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century.”

O’Callahan cites research that every dollar invested in fluoridation saves $38 in unneeded dental treatments. But he points out that nearly two-thirds of Washington residents have access to fluoridated water, but several large-sized communities do not fluoridate their drinking water. O’Callahan adds this note:

It’s not worth arguing with fluoridation opponents. If the pro-fluoride stances of the CDC, American Dental Association, World Health Organization, American Academy of Pediatrics and International Association of Dental Research (among others) don’t impress them, nothing will dental file.

Victory in Scappoose

Portland, Oregon residents will vote this spring on a fluoridation ballot measure. But voters in the town of Scappoose — roughly 30 minutes northwest of Portland — just had their say on this issue, voting by a wide margin in favor of maintaining water fluoridation.

The final vote gave supporters about 61% of the vote in Scappoose dental implant machine. The usual fear-based arguments were used in the town, but voters there decided to ignore these baseless claims and trust the substantial science that shows the important benefits of fluoridated water. This is good news for the 6,700 residents of Scappoose, who clearly care about the quality of their oral health.

Fluoridation in Watertown, New York

Watertown, NY (population: 27,000) lies about 70 miles north of Syracuse, and officials there have heard from a handful of people who want them to end water fluoridation micro motors australia. On Sunday, the Watertown Daily Times wrote an excellent editorial titled “Keep Fluoride.” In the editorial, the newspaper wrote:

Monday’s City Council meeting will finally present a forum for a fair hearing on whether the city should continue its near 50-year practice of adding fluoride to the water supply.

… The role of the (local) Dental Society is significant. The Dental Society rises above the selfish desire to earn fees from treating tooth decay because of its commitment to healthy patients. Dentists are the most knowledgeable people in society about oral hygiene and have devoted generations of expert medical practice to the prevention of decay dental vibrator. And they stand by their remarkable commitment to healthy teeth.

… The City Council and the three other candidates seeking open seats should listen carefully Monday night to the experts. The last thing Watertown needs is a reprise of the worldwide scorn that followed the council’s decision to regulate who could live in your home.

Protecting the teeth of youngsters has been an admirable and successful function of city government for more than 50 years. To reverse direction is irresponsible and sentences the next generation of children to a high incidence of tooth decay.

Blog Explores Why Portland is Wrong About Water Fluoridation

A Scientific American blog post discusses the many false and inaccurate scientific claims that were argued during the fluoride debate in Portland, OR mobile dental unit. Contrary to the beliefs of some in Portland, the article casts a light on the fact that there is no evidence that a regulated amount of fluoride in water supplies causes harm to consumers.

Exploring the Natural History of Fluoride

A recent article posted on the Wired online Science Blog aims to disarm claims that the presence of fluoride in water involves introducing unnatural industrial chemicals into water supplies. The article educates readers on the fact that fluoride is a naturally occurring element that is safe when administered at low levels in water supplies.

Newspapers and Fact-Checkers Agree Anti-Fluoride Activists Not Credible

From California to Wisconsin, and from Alaska to Florida, unbiased fact checkers and reputable news organizations agree: anti-fluoride claims are unfounded:

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
(Editorial published on May 31, 2012)
“… their arguments, no doubt sincere, aren’t based on much more than anecdote,
conjecture and studies that aren’t particular relevant to the U.S. practice
of community water fluoridation.”

The Nation’s Health
(News article published in July 2011)
“… water fluoridation is under fire from some who claim its health benefits
are overblown and that fluoridation creates a higher risk for heart disease
and cancer. There is no valid science supporting these claims … and yet they
persist, kept afloat by Internet rumors and misinformation.”

PolitiFact Ultrasonic
(News analysis published on April 19, 2011)
“(A Texas) resident says fluoride compound added to local water supply is
‘toxic waste’ … We rate the statement False.”

Anchorage Press
(News article published on August 8, 2013)
“The objectors (to water fluoridation) are often accused of exploiting quack
science and they’ve been known to promote conspiracy theories
that often get them ridiculed.”

Santa Cruz Sentinel
(News story published on November 27, 2011)
“Many studies against fluoridation or proving negative health effects have
reportedly been papers published at low-tier journals or studies
withdrawn after being published.”

Scientific American
(Blog post published on May 22, 2013)
“When new medical treatments are implemented, when new drugs are
introduced into the populace, there is always some hesitation. There are
(hopefully) some clinical trials to back up the new intervention, but the
long-term implications are often unclear. Water fluoridation doesn’t have this problem.
For over 65 years, it has been rigorously tested as a public health measure, and
considered one of the most successful measures of the last 100 years …”

Science Blogs
(Commentary article published on May 23, 2013)
“ … the antifluoride forces (in Oregon) were playing on the public’s fear of
chemicals and misunderstanding of chemistry to make fluoridation seem a lot
more scary than it is dental vibrator. Actually, it’s not scary at all. As always, the dose makes the
poison, and the levels used in municipal water supplies has a long history of safety.”

Tampa Bay Times
(Editorial published on March 17, 2012)
“The fluoride fight raises larger questions about our values: Are we going to
let scare tactics trump established science? … The opponents are small in
number but vocal, determined and ready with distortions, half-truths
and misstatements.”

Community water fluoridation has made great strides in improving people’s health and well-being throughout the United States for more than 60 years. Unfortunately, anti-fluoride activists continue linking water fortified with fluoride—a naturally occurring mineral—to a long list of health issues despite never offering credible evidence. Experts throughout the health care, dental, and scientific fields say that assuring an optimal level of this mineral in our water system results in healthier outcomes for all of us. dental equipment

Celebrate the 69th Anniversary of Fluoridation

The practice of community water fluoridation began on January 25, 1945 in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and has spread throughout the country to improve oral health ever since. The American Dental Association (ADA) is commemorating the anniversary by promoting their support for community water fluoridation, saying that the ADA “supports community water fluoridation as an effective and cost-efficient method to bring disease prevention to communities nationwide.” This public health practice has been named by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as one of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century.

Fluoridation’s Top 13 in 2013

2013 was a busy year in the fight to ensure all Americans have access to the oral health benefits of optimally fluoridated water, so we pulled together the following highlights from the past year. This list is just a snapshot of the pro-oral health efforts in 2013, but it clearly demonstrates that millions of Americans from rural Alaska to the U.S. Department of Defense, and many places in between, support the safety and effectiveness of community water fluoridation and are working together in the fight for fluoride.

Everyone at the Campaign for Dental Health looks forward to working with all of our partners and advocates around the country to continue to improve oral health and access to fluoride in 2014. Because, after all, life is better with teeth!

Top 13 in 2013
1. CDC released statistics showing the number of Americans with access to fluoridated water continued to increase between 2010 and 2012, to 74.6%. Compared to 2008, 15 million more Americans now receive the benefits of fluoridated water.

2. Surgeon General Regina Benjamin, MD, MBA joined a long list of surgeons general in endorsing community water fluoridation.

3. More than a dozen communities around the country defeated attempts to roll back access to fluoridated water. As a result of their efforts, more than 1.4 million people retained access to fluoride this year.

Salina, KS; Anchorage, AK; Columbia, MO; Clarksburg, WV; Des Moines, IA ; The Dalles, OR; Wayland, MA; Duxbury, MA; Lincoln, MA; Templeton, MA; Scituate, MA; Durham, NC; Mebane, NC; Graham, NC; Scappoose, OR; Chapel Hill, NC; Hampton, IA; Yorktown, NY.
4. At least three communities in the U.S. (Pinelas County, FL, St. Croix Falls, WI, and Brooksville, FL) fought to reverse decisions to remove fluoride and successfully restarted their fluoridation programs this year, with almost a million people regaining access to this preventive health benefit.

5. International support for fluoridation grew, too. Three communities in New Zealand reaffirmed their support for fluoridation; health officials in Australia released data strengthening the case for fluoridation in their country; and a new study found that German adults who grew up with fluoridated water experienced less tooth decay than those who did not.

6. The U.S dental implant machine. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) soundly rejected a petition to eliminate access to an important form of fluoride regularly utilized in community water systems.

7. The U.S. Department of Defense outlined plans to ensure all military personnel have access to fluoridated water to improve the health and readiness of the U.S. military.

8. The Campaign for Dental Health almost doubled its membership of state, local, and national organizations working together to advance and protect access to fluoridated water Ultrasonic Scaler.

9. Brighter Futures Michigan produced a new video to help educate the public about fluoridation’s safety and effectiveness.

10. Tampa Bay Times won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of local efforts to protect access to fluoridation.

11. The non-partisan fact-checkers at PolitiFact reviewed anti-fluoride activists’ claims and found them false. Other news organizations from around the country agreed: anti-fluoride activists’ claims are not credible.

12. In response to misrepresentations of the findings of peer-reviewed research conducted by Harvard scientists, the Deans of Harvard’s Medical School, School of Public Health, and School of Dental Medicine expressed their support of the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation.

13 scian nebulizer. On NBC’s Parks and Recreation, Deputy Director of the Parks Department and City Council member, Leslie Knope, (played by Amy Poehler) successfully fluoridated the water of fictional Pawnee, Indiana, or, as Tom Haverford (played by Aziz Ansari) put it, helped Pawnee’s residents get #TDazzle.

Diode Laser Brings Functionality and Superior Results to Practice

As a restorative dentist, one of the keys to providing precise, accurate, comfortable, predictable, and efficient care is the use of advanced technologies during clinical procedures. The goal of any technological advancement is to make the procedure faster, better, and more cost effective micro motors australia. Rarely do modern technologies meet all of these characteristics. As a result, I first look for technologies that make me better. Next, I consider if it will be more efficient. Will it provide ROI or at least make financial sense? Finally, can I use this technology with other technologies to amplify my efficiency and further improve the results?

I have owned diode lasers in the past, and I have used the electrosurge extensively. The benefits of the laser over the electrosurge are numerous: the ability to use safely with and around dental implants, significantly less surrounding tissue damage, less risk of damaging a natural tooth, less pain, no need to ground the patient, etc. My biggest critique of the lasers I owned was the lack of power to do the job both effectively and efficiently. Precise LTM changed that immediately, and I now use it almost every day, several times a day micro motor.

Implant crown has experienced a fractured abutment screw and thick dense keratinized tissue had covered over the implant. The area was anesthetized and exposed quickly and safely. The fractured screw fragment removed and a healing cap placed.

The Precise LTM is most commonly used for:

Uncovering dental implants when there is adequate keratinized soft tissue or the tissue has simply covered over an already exposed dental implant
contouring soft tissue in the aesthetic zone to achieve symmetry when gingivectomy is indicated over osseous crown lengthening
removing redundant inflamed tissue around crown preparations
troughing for particularly deeper crown margins prior to intraoral scanning.
“The goal of any technological advancement is to make the procedure faster, better and more cost effective.”
I use the laser almost daily to create optimum tissues, particularly around crown preparations. It serves the dual purpose of aiding in retraction for intraoral scanning (IOS) and in hemorrhage management dental supplies. In past years, I would have suffered with cord (which I still use) and hemostatic agent when working in an area with less than ideal tissue. Now I simply utilize the laser to make efficient and small changes to the tissue. This results in significant and fast improved tissue health, but it also makes impression or scanning of the final preparation easier and faster.

I try to utilize more than one technology for a given procedure and the two that have met my needs the best are: IOS and the Precise LTM Diode Laser. Their importance is on par with my high-speed handpiece. Both provide better clinical results, make me more efficient, and ìwowî the patients, and I enjoy practicing much more with them!

The synergy between the laser and IOS technology makes conventional crown and bridge techniques seem antiquated.

FiveThirtyEight Calls Case Against Fluoridation “Weak”

FiveThirtyEight is a widely read blog that was started by statistician Nate Silver Dental Chair. Although Silver gained fame by using opinion polls to predict political outcomes, his website recognizes the power of research and data to help us make better decisions in a wide range of areas. Health and wellness is a good example.

Community water fluoridation is a topic that has sparked a long list of claims, rumors and allegations. FiveThirtyEight’s Emily Oster decided to examine the research and evidence that are cited by people on both sides of the issue.

Oster tackles a variety of claims that opponents make about fluoridation, including a group of studies that supposedly link low IQ scores with fluoride. She points out that these studies “largely rely on data from China, and the variation in fluoride levels there arises not from community water fluoridation but from natural variation in the water’s fluoride levels scian nebulizer.” According to Oster, the biggest flaw in those Chinese studies is that the high fluoride levels are far higher than the concentration used to fluoridate drinking water in the United States.

“The bottom line is that if you want to build a case against water fluoridation — and, apparently, many people do — it is possible to do so,” writes Oster. “But the case is weak. The risks are small, and the public health benefits are big.”

Involve the Grassroots and Fluoride Wins!

Among Tuesday’s closely watched election battles around the country were no fewer than eight ballot measures asking voters to decide whether or not to initiate, retain, or restore community water fluoridation (CWF). Local residents sent a resounding message that they value this safe, effective, common-sense public health measure. By a margin of almost two to one, voters in seven municipalities chose CWF!

Community water fluoridation frequently falls under the purview of state or local boards of health because the public health of residents of all ages is “a paramount issue of statewide concern,” and dental health in an integral part of overall health.How Long Does A Mouthguard Last? for more information.

When this practice is challenged, community members are asked to weigh in, and what frequently ensues is a polarizing campaign. In notable instances, like the 2013 campaign to fluoridate Portland, Oregon, anti-fluoridation activists have used misinformation and fear and have successfully thwarted good public policy.

This week, well-organized coalitions demonstrated the power of the grassroots. These communities involved their citizens’ organizations, dentists, hygienists, youth groups, physicians, public health professionals, and countless others to share their stories and the sound science behind CWF with local residents. They went door to door, asked questions, offered fact-based information, and had conversations that mattered. And the results were remarkable.

These five wins come at a critical time. While these communities have successfully maintained CWF, there are still others that have yet to reap its protective benefits, and attempts to suspend fluoride in locales where it is already in place are sure to come up again. The power of community – of grassroots organizing – cannot be overstated turbine air compressor. Engaging people – neighbor to neighbor, dentist to patient, and peer to peer – is a clear path to more CWF wins. So strap on your walking shoes and let’s get organized!

The Tooth Fairy Gave You How Much

Kids these days. We remember back when we lost a tooth and the Tooth Fairy left us a quarter or maybe, if we were lucky, a crisp dollar bill tooth scaler australia. Times sure have changed.

Tooth Fairy Graph

On August 22, we are joining in on the celebration of National Tooth Fairy Day! Now children may receive a $5 bill covered in glitter (that’s $100 dollars for all 20 teeth!) or even a wisp of sparkle across their cheek as the tooth fairy delicately prances across their faces to get to her prize under the pillow.

In terms of oral health, the Tooth Fairy is a great way to raise awareness about the importance of healthy teeth with children and their families. Children love the story (which ever you choose) and it gives parents, teachers, health professionals and others the opportunity to talk about good oral hygiene, diet and nutrition, topical fluoride, and the importance of community water fluoridation.

If you are up for Tooth Fairy 2.0, check out these FREE resources to help make the experience fun and an important time to talk about oral health.

Four-State Collaborative Launches New From the First Tooth Website!

From the First Tooth™ is a pediatric oral health initiative promoting the oral health of infants, toddlers and preschool children micro motor. The purpose of the initiative is to assist primary care medical providers integrate the following as standard of care for young pediatric patients:FirstTooth Dental Health Site

Assessing the oral health of young children
Applying fluoride varnish to help prevent tooth decay
Educating parents and caregivers about pediatric oral health
Making dental referrals
From the First Tooth™ supports primary care medical clinicians in providing preventive oral health interventions for young children. From the First Tooth™ is a four state collaborative located in Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island. Each state offers slightly different assistance to practices but we are all working with health care providers to improve children’s oral health in the region dental handpiece.

FTFT is funded by the DentaQuest Foundation in all four states and by the Sadie and Harry Davis Foundation and Northeast Delta Dental in Maine.


Please don’t hesitate to contact me for more information about my work. I am available Mon – Sat, Sunday is a day of rest.

Phone: 777.777.7777

No more, where are you going?

Go back to top or use the menu to your left to navigate.

Thanks for downloading!